Wikipedia, gone bad
So I subscribe to a lot of news rss feeds (for those of you who don't know what those are, think of them as custom made newspapers). One of the newspapers that I've found to give an interesting and refreshing perspective on Israel is the UK's Independent. The writings of one of their middle east columnists, Robert Fisk, have grabbed my interest particularly - from what I've been able to say hes got his head screwed on the right way, one smart cookie.
Recently I read one of his articles that was not actually about Israel, but was still intensely interesting and bothersome to me. In this article Fisk tells the story of one Professor Taner Akçam, a Turkish historian known for being the first to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide - "the deliberate mass murder of up to a million and a half Armenians by the Ottoman Turkish authorities in 1915" (cited from the above mentioned article). He is also the author of a book which proves the existence of the genocide using Turkish documents and archives. This has (not surprisingly) earned him a great deal of persecution, both from Turkish authorities and from Turkish American groups. He fled Turkey to escape this and was granted asylum in Germany, and in 1976 he was adopted as a prisoner of conscience by Amnesty International.
Why did Fisk choose to write about this seemingly dated piece of news? Well recently this case has taken a twisted turn for the worse. On February 16th, 2007 Akçam was detained by Canadian immigration while flying into Montreal for a lecture. The reason? A vandalized Wikipedia biography of him, labeling him as a terrorist. This occurrence was repeated on his attempt to return home, only there it was U.S. Homeland Security officers who detained him.
Putting aside how ridiculous the idea that the way our country gathers intelligence on potential terrorists is from Wikipedia. Putting aside even how insane it is that Homeland Security recommended that Akçam hire lawyers to get this information removed from his files in Washington, or that he was detained twice to what amounts to an unsubstantiated rumor.
Does it scare anybody else that Wikipedia is being used by oppressive governments to punish those who criticize them?
I have no more to say on this, other than I will never again cite Wikipedia in any meaningful context. Anyone who wishes to know more about these things should check out the following linked articles:
Robert Fisk's article from the Independent, where I first learned of these happenings
An article by Akçam himself, where he tells of the incident from his point of view. This article has been published in many different sources, and I'm not sure which is the original or if Mr. Akçam submitted the article to several different sources.